Elizabeth Boggs
Mr. Brasof 1-2
POG 2
I would never get the iChip, to surf the Internet, talk on the phone and so the government can track us. Something would go terribly wrong with the iChip. Does the U.S. Constitution resolve conflict? The U.S. Constitution does resolve conflict because without one people would violate other people rights and the government would step in and punish those people. Violating other peoples rights, like when President Young had took the citizens poster board and ripped it up. Well in Article 2 Section 1, “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the Untied States of America.” So, when the president did that the citizens tried to get him impeached Freedom of speech was another big part in the iDeal society that was violated. The citizens had the right to protest and say what’s on their mind but the president did not allow them to do so. The First Amendment says “Abridging the Freedom of speech or of the press or the right of the people peaceable to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” When Citizen Shay had got locked up it was a freedom of speech but the president didn’t think so. To be punished, in Amendment 5, “Be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law” that means people can not go to jail, get their life taken liberty and or property without going though the law. So, when Agent Fred first locked Citizen Shay up the courts didn’t give her any information on the law and her punishment. Also, in Article 3, Section 2 it say, “Both as to Law and Facts.” That indicates, that in order to lock someone up the police have to have “FACTS” that the Person did something, the police can not say they did it. The U.S. Constitution does resolve conflicts, such as violating peoples rights, freedom of speech and punishment. Do you think the U.S. Constitution resolves conflict?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment