Monday, November 5, 2007
What I Will Learn This Year
Elizabeth Boggs Mr.Romero 8/9 What I Will Learn This Year What subject do you think is most important subject I would learn is Constitution. I think that because it teaches me about history, countries and it would help in the future. There are numerous reasons why I think Constitution is most important subject because it teaches me about history and more about the world. Another reason is it helps me just as others to understand other countries and their cultures. Last, but not least it helps people to have a good job. Over all Constitution is the best subject in Constitution High School.So, what do you think is the most important subject?
TAB Inc.
T.A.B
Hello, my name is Elizabeth Boggs and I’m the lawyer of a small organization called T.A.B. We have a new iChip called TABO. It has a navigation system, the Internet, a tracking device and a cell phone. This iChip is going in the pituitary gland, a part of the brain that controls your growth. Our scientists determined that this is the safest and most accessible placement for the iChip. It is important for all citizens to get this device to prevent being kidnapped or lost, you can also communicate with your friends. On the positive side, if you are out with your friends and you can’t find them you can track them down.
Due to the nature of growth and development, only people 18 years of age and older may receive the iChip because if you are 18 years of age and older it wouldn’t effect your growth in any way.
The iChip does not violate your Constitutional Right. The Fourth Amendment says “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects.” The iChip is as secure as you can ever be. Article 1 section 8, says “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective Writings and discoveries.” Progress means new technology for years coming. So basically whatever a sciencetist have to offer such as the iChip it is legal.
Hello, my name is Elizabeth Boggs and I’m the lawyer of a small organization called T.A.B. We have a new iChip called TABO. It has a navigation system, the Internet, a tracking device and a cell phone. This iChip is going in the pituitary gland, a part of the brain that controls your growth. Our scientists determined that this is the safest and most accessible placement for the iChip. It is important for all citizens to get this device to prevent being kidnapped or lost, you can also communicate with your friends. On the positive side, if you are out with your friends and you can’t find them you can track them down.
Due to the nature of growth and development, only people 18 years of age and older may receive the iChip because if you are 18 years of age and older it wouldn’t effect your growth in any way.
The iChip does not violate your Constitutional Right. The Fourth Amendment says “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects.” The iChip is as secure as you can ever be. Article 1 section 8, says “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective Writings and discoveries.” Progress means new technology for years coming. So basically whatever a sciencetist have to offer such as the iChip it is legal.
POG 2
Elizabeth Boggs
Mr. Brasof 1-2
POG 2
I would never get the iChip, to surf the Internet, talk on the phone and so the government can track us. Something would go terribly wrong with the iChip. Does the U.S. Constitution resolve conflict? The U.S. Constitution does resolve conflict because without one people would violate other people rights and the government would step in and punish those people. Violating other peoples rights, like when President Young had took the citizens poster board and ripped it up. Well in Article 2 Section 1, “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the Untied States of America.” So, when the president did that the citizens tried to get him impeached Freedom of speech was another big part in the iDeal society that was violated. The citizens had the right to protest and say what’s on their mind but the president did not allow them to do so. The First Amendment says “Abridging the Freedom of speech or of the press or the right of the people peaceable to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” When Citizen Shay had got locked up it was a freedom of speech but the president didn’t think so. To be punished, in Amendment 5, “Be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law” that means people can not go to jail, get their life taken liberty and or property without going though the law. So, when Agent Fred first locked Citizen Shay up the courts didn’t give her any information on the law and her punishment. Also, in Article 3, Section 2 it say, “Both as to Law and Facts.” That indicates, that in order to lock someone up the police have to have “FACTS” that the Person did something, the police can not say they did it. The U.S. Constitution does resolve conflicts, such as violating peoples rights, freedom of speech and punishment. Do you think the U.S. Constitution resolves conflict?
Mr. Brasof 1-2
POG 2
I would never get the iChip, to surf the Internet, talk on the phone and so the government can track us. Something would go terribly wrong with the iChip. Does the U.S. Constitution resolve conflict? The U.S. Constitution does resolve conflict because without one people would violate other people rights and the government would step in and punish those people. Violating other peoples rights, like when President Young had took the citizens poster board and ripped it up. Well in Article 2 Section 1, “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the Untied States of America.” So, when the president did that the citizens tried to get him impeached Freedom of speech was another big part in the iDeal society that was violated. The citizens had the right to protest and say what’s on their mind but the president did not allow them to do so. The First Amendment says “Abridging the Freedom of speech or of the press or the right of the people peaceable to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” When Citizen Shay had got locked up it was a freedom of speech but the president didn’t think so. To be punished, in Amendment 5, “Be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law” that means people can not go to jail, get their life taken liberty and or property without going though the law. So, when Agent Fred first locked Citizen Shay up the courts didn’t give her any information on the law and her punishment. Also, in Article 3, Section 2 it say, “Both as to Law and Facts.” That indicates, that in order to lock someone up the police have to have “FACTS” that the Person did something, the police can not say they did it. The U.S. Constitution does resolve conflicts, such as violating peoples rights, freedom of speech and punishment. Do you think the U.S. Constitution resolves conflict?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
